SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Workday, Inc.

Apple vs. Workday: SG&A Strategies Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Workday, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000263294000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000421891000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000582634000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000781996000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000906276000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001238682000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001514272000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001647241000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001947933000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000002452180000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000002841000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Apple Inc. and Workday, Inc. stand as titans, each with its unique approach to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Apple has consistently demonstrated a robust SG&A strategy, with expenses growing from approximately $12 billion to over $26 billion. This represents a growth of about 117%, reflecting Apple's expansive global operations and marketing prowess.

Conversely, Workday, Inc., a leader in enterprise cloud applications, has seen its SG&A expenses rise from around $263 million to nearly $2.8 billion, marking an impressive increase of over 960%. This surge underscores Workday's aggressive market expansion and investment in customer acquisition.

While Apple's SG&A expenses are significantly higher in absolute terms, Workday's rapid growth rate highlights its dynamic approach in a competitive market. This comparison offers a fascinating glimpse into how two industry leaders allocate resources to drive growth and maintain market leadership.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025