SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Eli Lilly and Company and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Eli Lilly vs. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480006620800000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040006533000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560006452000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172550620006588100000
Monday, January 1, 20182657580005975100000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193256380006213800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203886610006121200000
Friday, January 1, 20213960280006431600000
Saturday, January 1, 20223690900006440400000
Sunday, January 1, 20234024660006941200000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of Eli Lilly and Company with ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023.

Eli Lilly, a giant in the industry, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $6.4 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses remained relatively stable, showcasing a robust cost management strategy. In contrast, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, saw a significant rise in SG&A expenses, increasing by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects ACADIA's aggressive expansion and investment in market presence.

Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies, highlighting the diverse approaches within the pharmaceutical sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025