Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800017986000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400032480000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600068081000
Sunday, January 1, 2017255062000169906000
Monday, January 1, 2018265758000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019325638000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020388661000433300000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine Biosciences vs. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for sustained growth. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Neurocrine Biosciences has seen a staggering increase of nearly 4900% in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals experienced a more moderate rise of approximately 1100%, indicating a steady but cautious approach to scaling operations. By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses were more than double those of ACADIA, highlighting their divergent strategies. This data not only underscores the dynamic nature of the biotech industry but also offers insights into how these companies prioritize their resources to drive innovation and market presence.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025