Comparing SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: GSK's Stability vs. ACADIA's Growth

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480008246000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040009232000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560009366000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172550620009672000000
Monday, January 1, 20182657580009915000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800011402000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100011456000000
Friday, January 1, 202139602800010975000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223690900008372000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234024660009385000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial dynamics of companies is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of GSK plc and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. over the past decade.

GSK plc: A Steady Giant

From 2014 to 2023, GSK plc consistently reported SG&A expenses in the range of $8.2 billion to $11.5 billion. Despite fluctuations, GSK's expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting its robust market position and strategic investments.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: A Rising Contender

In contrast, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. exhibited a significant upward trend, with expenses growing from $32.7 million in 2014 to $402.5 million in 2023. This 12-fold increase underscores ACADIA's aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies.

Insights and Implications

While GSK's expenses highlight its established presence, ACADIA's growth trajectory signals its ambition to challenge industry norms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025