SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: Halozyme vs. Rhythm's Strategic Growth

__timestampHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014359420001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015400280003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016458530006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017538160009518000
Monday, January 1, 20186080400028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197725200036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204573600046125000
Friday, January 1, 20215032300068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202214352600092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023149182000117532000
Monday, January 1, 2024154335000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. offer a fascinating study in SG&A (Selling, General, and Administrative) efficiency over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Halozyme's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 315%, while Rhythm's expenses skyrocketed by nearly 9,600%. This dramatic increase for Rhythm, especially between 2018 and 2023, reflects its aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Halozyme's more measured growth suggests a focus on sustainable scaling. By 2023, Halozyme's SG&A expenses reached 149 million, slightly ahead of Rhythm's 118 million, indicating a more controlled expenditure strategy. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies biotech companies employ to balance growth and operational efficiency, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025