SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: ImmunityBio vs. Madrigal Efficiency

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600015746000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600013392000
Friday, January 1, 2016943910009290000
Sunday, January 1, 2017538210007672000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800021864000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600037318000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800048130000
Sunday, January 1, 2023129620000108146000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ImmunityBio, Inc. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses peaked in 2015, reaching a staggering 226 million, while Madrigal's highest was in 2023, at 108 million. Despite ImmunityBio's higher expenses, their trend shows a more volatile pattern, with a significant drop to 35 million in 2018. In contrast, Madrigal's expenses have steadily increased, reflecting a more consistent growth strategy. By 2023, Madrigal's SG&A expenses were nearly 48% of ImmunityBio's, highlighting their efficient cost management. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in sustaining growth and competitiveness in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025