SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Merck vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

__timestampMerck & Co., Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014116060000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015103130000003425000
Friday, January 1, 201697620000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 201798300000009518000
Monday, January 1, 20181010200000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191061500000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020895500000046125000
Friday, January 1, 2021963400000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20221004200000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202310504000000117532000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.

Merck & Co., Inc.: A Steady Giant

From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent pattern, averaging around $10 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, Merck's strategic management has kept its SG&A expenses relatively stable, reflecting its robust operational efficiency.

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: A Growing Contender

In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has experienced a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, from just over $1 million in 2014 to approximately $117 million in 2023. This 9,500% surge highlights Rhythm's aggressive expansion and investment in growth.

Conclusion

This analysis underscores the diverse strategies in SG&A management within the pharmaceutical industry, offering insights into how companies balance growth and efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025