SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Pfizer vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

__timestampPfizer Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014140970000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015148090000003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016148370000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017147840000009518000
Monday, January 1, 20181445500000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191435000000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201161500000046125000
Friday, January 1, 20211270300000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20221367700000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202314771000000117532000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Pfizer, a global giant, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $14 billion annually, reflecting its expansive operations. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, a smaller entity, demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses surging from a modest $1.2 million in 2014 to over $117 million by 2023. This represents an exponential increase of nearly 9,600%, highlighting Rhythm's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration. Such insights underscore the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in balancing growth and operational efficiency. As the industry evolves, these financial metrics will continue to play a pivotal role in shaping corporate strategies and investor decisions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025