Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited or Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Teva vs. Rhythm: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201412130005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 201534250004717000000
Friday, January 1, 201663110005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 201795180004986000000
Monday, January 1, 2018280800004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019365500003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020461250003671000000
Friday, January 1, 2021684860003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022920320003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231175320003498000000
Monday, January 1, 20243702000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Teva's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at approximately $5 billion in 2016. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A costs rise from a modest $1.2 million in 2014 to $117 million in 2023, reflecting its growth trajectory. Despite Teva's larger scale, its SG&A expenses have decreased by about 32% from 2014 to 2023, indicating improved cost management. Meanwhile, Rhythm's expenses have surged, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy. This comparison underscores the different challenges and strategies faced by established giants and emerging innovators in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025