__timestamp | MannKind Corporation | Pfizer Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 79383000 | 14097000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 108402000 | 14809000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 46928000 | 14837000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 74959000 | 14784000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 79716000 | 14455000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 74669000 | 14350000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 59040000 | 11615000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 77417000 | 12703000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 91473000 | 13677000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 94314000 | 14771000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14730000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of Pfizer Inc. and MannKind Corporation from 2014 to 2023.
Pfizer, a global pharmaceutical giant, consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $14 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, Pfizer's expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting its robust operational scale and market presence.
In contrast, MannKind Corporation, a smaller player, exhibited more volatility. Its SG&A expenses ranged from $47 million to $108 million, highlighting the challenges faced by smaller firms in managing operational costs.
Over the decade, Pfizer's SG&A expenses were approximately 200 times higher than MannKind's, underscoring the disparity in scale and market strategy between the two companies.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs GSK plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Pharming Group N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Mesoblast Limited
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and MannKind Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and MannKind Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Viking Therapeutics, Inc. vs MannKind Corporation Trends and Insights
MannKind Corporation and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
MannKind Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared