SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pharming Group N.V. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: Pharming vs. CymaBay

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Pharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201481850004042025
Thursday, January 1, 201588710005279557
Friday, January 1, 201696450008073913
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700044864073
Monday, January 1, 20181438100053488904
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800065896361
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500069968267
Friday, January 1, 20212304000092047281
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000131819000
Sunday, January 1, 20235195300087501000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Pharming Group N.V. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency. From 2014 to 2023, Pharming Group N.V. saw a staggering 3,160% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. experienced a more modest 535% rise, with a significant jump in 2023. This divergence highlights different strategic priorities: Pharming's aggressive expansion versus CymaBay's steady growth. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how biotech firms allocate resources to drive innovation and market presence. As the industry evolves, monitoring SG&A efficiency will remain a key indicator of a company's operational strategy and financial discipline.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025