SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: PTC vs. Rhythm's Expense Strategies

__timestampPTC Therapeutics, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014448200001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015820800003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016971300006311000
Sunday, January 1, 20171212710009518000
Monday, January 1, 201815354800028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920254100036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 202024516400046125000
Friday, January 1, 202128577300068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202232599800092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023332540000117532000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

PTC Therapeutics, Inc.: A Steady Climb

PTC Therapeutics has seen a consistent rise in SG&A expenses, starting from approximately $45 million in 2014 to over $330 million in 2023. This represents a staggering increase of over 630%, reflecting the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: A Rapid Surge

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, on the other hand, began with a modest $1.2 million in 2014, skyrocketing to $117 million by 2023. This exponential growth, over 9,500%, underscores the company's rapid scaling efforts and strategic market positioning.

Conclusion

Both companies demonstrate distinct strategies in managing SG&A expenses, highlighting their unique paths in the biotech landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025