__timestamp | Pure Storage, Inc. | Sony Group Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 60652000 | 1728520000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 184674000 | 1811461000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 315976000 | 1691930000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 444687000 | 1505956000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 575200000 | 1583197000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 721617000 | 1576825000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 891175000 | 1502625000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 898491000 | 1469955000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 988982000 | 1588473000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1121605000 | 1969170000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1197264000 | 2156156000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. This analysis juxtaposes the SG&A efficiency of Sony Group Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2024.
Sony, a titan in the electronics industry, consistently allocated a significant portion of its revenue to SG&A expenses. Despite fluctuations, Sony's SG&A expenses remained relatively stable, peaking at approximately 2.16 trillion in 2024, reflecting a strategic focus on maintaining operational efficiency.
In contrast, Pure Storage, a leader in data storage solutions, demonstrated a dynamic growth trajectory. From a modest 60 million in 2014, its SG&A expenses surged to nearly 1.2 billion by 2024, indicating aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration.
This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by these companies in managing their SG&A expenses, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.
Sony Group Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sony Group Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Sony Group Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sony Group Corporation and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Sony Group Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sony Group Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Sony Group Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc. Trends and Insights
Sony Group Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Sony Group Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sony Group Corporation or Teradyne, Inc.
Sony Group Corporation or Trimble Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Sony Group Corporation or Manhattan Associates, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?