SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sony Group Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Sony vs. Pure Storage Over a Decade

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606520001728520000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151846740001811461000000
Friday, January 1, 20163159760001691930000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174446870001505956000000
Monday, January 1, 20185752000001583197000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197216170001576825000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208911750001502625000000
Friday, January 1, 20218984910001469955000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229889820001588473000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311216050001969170000000
Monday, January 1, 202411972640002156156000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. This analysis juxtaposes the SG&A efficiency of Sony Group Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2024.

Sony Group Corporation: A Steady Giant

Sony, a titan in the electronics industry, consistently allocated a significant portion of its revenue to SG&A expenses. Despite fluctuations, Sony's SG&A expenses remained relatively stable, peaking at approximately 2.16 trillion in 2024, reflecting a strategic focus on maintaining operational efficiency.

Pure Storage, Inc.: A Rising Star

In contrast, Pure Storage, a leader in data storage solutions, demonstrated a dynamic growth trajectory. From a modest 60 million in 2014, its SG&A expenses surged to nearly 1.2 billion by 2024, indicating aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration.

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by these companies in managing their SG&A expenses, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025