__timestamp | Sony Group Corporation | Trimble Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1728520000000 | 634689000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1811461000000 | 629900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1691930000000 | 633600000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1505956000000 | 706500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1583197000000 | 829600000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1576825000000 | 834800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1502625000000 | 767900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1469955000000 | 875900000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1588473000000 | 975800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1969170000000 | 1070500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2156156000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the competitive landscape of global corporations, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost management of Sony Group Corporation and Trimble Inc. over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, Sony's SG&A expenses have shown a fluctuating trend, peaking in 2024 with a 25% increase from 2014. In contrast, Trimble Inc. has demonstrated a more consistent approach, with a steady rise in expenses, culminating in a 69% increase by 2023.
Sony's significant rise in 2023 suggests strategic investments or restructuring, while Trimble's steady growth indicates a controlled expansion strategy. The absence of data for Trimble in 2024 leaves room for speculation on future trends.
In conclusion, while Sony shows dynamic cost management, Trimble's steady approach may offer more predictability.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Sony Group Corporation vs Trimble Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Sony Group Corporation vs Trimble Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Sony Group Corporation and Trimble Inc. Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Sony Group Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sony Group Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.
Sony Group Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Sony Group Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sony Group Corporation or Teradyne, Inc.
Sony Group Corporation or Manhattan Associates, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Sony Group Corporation vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Sony Group Corporation vs CyberArk Software Ltd. Trends and Insights
EBITDA Performance Review: Sony Group Corporation vs Trimble Inc.