Summit Therapeutics Inc. or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

ACADIA vs. Summit: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480006795238
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040007454247
Friday, January 1, 201618645600010345862
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200016984203
Monday, January 1, 201826575800016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 20193256380009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100019232000
Friday, January 1, 202139602800023611000
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600028215000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have taken different paths in this regard. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Summit Therapeutics maintained a more conservative growth, with expenses increasing by approximately 315% over the same period. This stark difference highlights ACADIA's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, possibly to support rapid growth and expansion. Meanwhile, Summit's more restrained approach may reflect a focus on cost efficiency. As investors and stakeholders evaluate these companies, understanding their SG&A strategies provides valuable insights into their operational priorities and financial management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025