Thomson Reuters Corporation or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201425959000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201524864000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201626239000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729801000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201831717000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930410000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030896000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023282930000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20243310500000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $2.94 billion annually. In contrast, Thomson Reuters saw a dramatic reduction, from $9.21 billion in 2014 to a mere $64 million by 2023, reflecting a strategic shift or restructuring.

Key Insights

  • Stanley Black & Decker: Consistent management with a slight upward trend, peaking in 2022.
  • Thomson Reuters: Significant cost-cutting, reducing SG&A by over 99% in nine years.

This analysis highlights the diverse approaches to cost management, offering valuable lessons for businesses aiming to optimize their financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025