Thomson Reuters Corporation or Lennox International Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Lennox vs. Thomson Reuters

__timestampLennox International Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145737000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155805000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20166210000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176377000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20186082000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195859000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205559000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20215989000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226272000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202370550000064000000
Monday, January 1, 2024730600000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Lennox International Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Lennox International Inc. maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense trend, with a notable increase of approximately 27% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Thomson Reuters Corporation saw a dramatic reduction of nearly 99% in SG&A expenses over the same period, reflecting strategic cost-cutting measures. However, data for 2024 is missing for Thomson Reuters, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This analysis highlights the importance of strategic financial management in sustaining competitive advantage and profitability. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, effective SG&A management remains a key differentiator.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025