Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Ryanair Holdings plc

SG&A Cost Management: Thomson Reuters vs. Ryanair

__timestampRyanair Holdings plcThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141928000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152339000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20162927000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173223000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20184104000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195473000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205788000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20212015000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224113000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202367440000064000000
Monday, January 1, 2024757200000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Ryanair Holdings plc from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, has seen a significant reduction in SG&A expenses, dropping from a peak of over $9 billion in 2014 to just $64 million in 2023. This represents a remarkable 99% decrease, showcasing their strategic cost management.

Conversely, Ryanair, Europe's largest airline by passenger numbers, has experienced a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising from $192 million in 2014 to $757 million in 2023, a nearly fourfold increase. This trend reflects their aggressive expansion strategy.

While Thomson Reuters focuses on cost efficiency, Ryanair invests in growth, highlighting two distinct approaches to SG&A management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025