| __timestamp | Masco Corporation | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1607000000 | 9209000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1339000000 | 8810000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1403000000 | 8232000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1442000000 | 8079000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1478000000 | 4131000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1274000000 | 4413000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1292000000 | 3999000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1413000000 | 1624000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1390000000 | 1622000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1481000000 | 64000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1468000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. This analysis compares the SG&A expenses of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Masco Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Thomson Reuters saw a dramatic decline in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a peak of over $9 billion in 2014 to just $64 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 99% reduction, reflecting significant cost-cutting measures or strategic shifts. In contrast, Masco Corporation's SG&A expenses remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $1.4 billion annually, with a slight increase of about 5% from 2014 to 2023. This stability suggests a consistent operational strategy. The contrasting trends highlight different corporate strategies and market responses, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.
Revenue Showdown: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Watsco, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and TransUnion
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Thomson Reuters Corporation or J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation