__timestamp | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 401669000 | 4289000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 412042000 | 3151000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 405217000 | 2999000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 441085000 | 1495930891 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 493171000 | 1345686008 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 530221000 | 1913474675 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 414499000 | 2757000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 509134000 | 1994296441 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 548202000 | 3010000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 630635000 | 2950000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 674592000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the financial performance of companies is a testament to their strategic prowess and market adaptability. This article delves into the EBITDA performance of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over the past decade, offering a window into their financial health and operational efficiency.
From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters Corporation experienced significant fluctuations in its EBITDA. Starting strong in 2014, the company saw a decline of approximately 31% by 2017, before rebounding with a 101% increase by 2022. This volatility reflects the company's strategic shifts and market challenges.
In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation demonstrated a more consistent growth trajectory. Over the same period, its EBITDA increased by roughly 57%, showcasing a stable and upward trend. This steady ascent highlights the company's resilience and effective management strategies.
The contrasting EBITDA trends of these two corporations underscore the diverse challenges and opportunities faced by businesses in different sectors. As investors and analysts, understanding these dynamics is crucial for making informed decisions.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Elbit Systems Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs TFI International Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Rentokil Initial plc