TransUnion or Elbit Systems Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost management: TransUnion vs. Elbit Systems Ltd.

__timestampElbit Systems Ltd.TransUnion
Wednesday, January 1, 2014356171000436000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015385059000499700000
Friday, January 1, 2016422390000560100000
Sunday, January 1, 2017413560000585400000
Monday, January 1, 2018441362000707700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019516149000812100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020514638000860300000
Friday, January 1, 2021559113000943900000
Saturday, January 1, 20226390670001337400000
Sunday, January 1, 20236960220001171600000
Monday, January 1, 20241239300000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Cost Management

In the competitive landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. TransUnion and Elbit Systems Ltd., two giants in their respective industries, offer a fascinating study in cost management from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, TransUnion's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 169%, peaking in 2022, while Elbit Systems Ltd. saw a more modest increase of about 95%. This suggests that TransUnion's operational scale and market expansion might have driven higher costs, whereas Elbit Systems Ltd. maintained a steadier growth trajectory. The data highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining competitive advantage. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, these insights underscore the need for balanced growth strategies that align with financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025