__timestamp | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | TransUnion |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 426301000 | 436000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 411801000 | 499700000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 383793000 | 560100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 418544000 | 585400000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 433110000 | 707700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 422272000 | 812100000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 412825000 | 860300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 443096000 | 943900000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 445679000 | 1337400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 496812000 | 1171600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 518857000 | 1239300000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and TransUnion have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Curtiss-Wright maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $429 million annually, with a modest increase of approximately 16% over the period. In contrast, TransUnion's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 169%, peaking at $1.34 billion in 2022. This stark difference highlights TransUnion's aggressive expansion and investment strategy, while Curtiss-Wright's steady approach reflects a focus on operational efficiency. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing growth with cost management. The data underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in sustaining long-term success.
TransUnion vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: TransUnion vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
TransUnion vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
TransUnion and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: TransUnion vs Pool Corporation
TransUnion or Elbit Systems Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: TransUnion vs U-Haul Holding Company Trends and Insights
TransUnion vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of TransUnion and Nordson Corporation
EBITDA Performance Review: TransUnion vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation