Verona Pharma plc and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biopharma SG&A Trends: Rhythm vs. Verona

__timestampRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Verona Pharma plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201412130001802274
Thursday, January 1, 201534250002512761
Friday, January 1, 201663110002894488
Sunday, January 1, 201795180008096274
Monday, January 1, 2018280800007985229
Tuesday, January 1, 2019365500008994597
Wednesday, January 1, 20204612500029772000
Friday, January 1, 20216848600033907000
Saturday, January 1, 20229203200026579000
Sunday, January 1, 202311753200049868547
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the dynamic world of biopharmaceuticals, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Verona Pharma plc have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

From 2014 to 2023, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 97 times from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Verona Pharma's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 28 times over the same period, indicating a more measured approach.

By 2023, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals' SG&A expenses were more than double those of Verona Pharma, highlighting their commitment to scaling operations. These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by biopharma companies in navigating the competitive landscape.

Understanding these patterns is crucial for investors and stakeholders aiming to gauge future growth trajectories and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025