Viking Therapeutics, Inc. or Novavax, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampNovavax, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014199280001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015308420005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016465270004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017344510005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018344090007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019344170009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014529000010731000
Friday, January 1, 202129835800010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202248869100016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202346894600037021000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Viking Therapeutics or Novavax?

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. From 2014 to 2023, Novavax, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting approaches. Novavax's SG&A expenses surged by over 2,250% from 2014 to 2023, peaking in 2022. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 2,870% over the same period, yet remaining significantly lower than Novavax's. This suggests a leaner operational model. As of 2023, Novavax's expenses were nearly 13 times higher than Viking's, highlighting their differing strategies. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial strategies and potential for sustainable growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025