Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ADMA Biologics, Inc. or Evotec SE

SG&A Cost Optimization: ADMA vs. Evotec

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Evotec SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386917990000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596825166000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474227013000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283542383000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292257012000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075766546000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081777238000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889105445000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024156190000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000169610000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Evotec SE have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics, Inc. saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $4.8 million to nearly $59 million, marking a twelvefold increase. In contrast, Evotec SE's expenses surged from $18 million to $170 million, a ninefold rise. Despite Evotec SE's higher absolute costs, their growth rate in SG&A expenses is relatively more controlled compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. This data suggests that while both companies are expanding, Evotec SE might be leveraging economies of scale more effectively. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights for investors and stakeholders in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025