Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Agios vs. BioCryst: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampAgios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014191200007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20153599200013047000
Friday, January 1, 20165071400011253000
Sunday, January 1, 20177112400013933000
Monday, January 1, 201811414500029514000
Tuesday, January 1, 201913203400037121000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014907000067929000
Friday, January 1, 2021121445000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 2022121673000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 2023119903000213894000
Monday, January 1, 2024156784000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have been navigating this challenge since 2014. Over the years, Agios has seen a steady increase in SG&A costs, peaking in 2020 with a 680% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, BioCryst's expenses surged dramatically, especially between 2021 and 2023, with a staggering 2,765% increase from 2014.

While Agios maintained a more consistent growth, BioCryst's recent spike suggests aggressive expansion or strategic shifts. This data highlights the importance of cost management in sustaining growth and competitiveness. As these companies continue to innovate, their ability to optimize SG&A expenses will be pivotal in determining their long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025