Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Amphastar vs. BioCryst: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014403730007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20154697400013047000
Friday, January 1, 20164729800011253000
Sunday, January 1, 20175091800013933000
Monday, January 1, 20185804400029514000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196310900037121000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206515700067929000
Friday, January 1, 202168920000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 202266592000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000213894000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: Amphastar vs. BioCryst

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding the financial dynamics of companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Amphastar's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 99%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses surged by an astounding 2,765% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments.

Amphastar maintained a steady growth trajectory, with expenses increasing by about 65% from 2014 to 2019, before a sharper rise in the following years. Meanwhile, BioCryst's expenses skyrocketed, particularly from 2020 onwards, indicating a shift in operational strategy. This financial evolution highlights the differing approaches of these two industry players, offering insights into their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025