Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Alkermes plc or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Alkermes vs. ImmunityBio: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAlkermes plcImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141999050004326000
Thursday, January 1, 2015311558000226206000
Friday, January 1, 201637413000094391000
Sunday, January 1, 201742157800053821000
Monday, January 1, 201852640800035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 201959944900046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 202053882700071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021560977000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022605747000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023689751000129620000
Monday, January 1, 2024645238000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Alkermes plc and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken distinct paths in optimizing these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Alkermes plc consistently increased its SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly 690 million in 2023. This represents a growth of over 240% from its 2014 figures. In contrast, ImmunityBio, Inc. maintained a more conservative approach, with its highest SG&A expenses reaching approximately 130 million in 2023, a modest increase compared to Alkermes.

Strategic Implications

Alkermes' strategy suggests a focus on aggressive expansion and market penetration, while ImmunityBio's restrained spending may indicate a focus on efficiency and targeted growth. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into how companies navigate financial management in a dynamic market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025