Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Ascendis Pharma A/S

Biotech Giants: Alnylam vs. Ascendis in SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ascendis Pharma A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260006274000
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100009415000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400011504000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500013482000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900025057000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500048473000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000076669000
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000160180000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000221227000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000264410000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000284545000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ascendis Pharma A/S, two prominent players in the industry, have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 1,700%, from $44.5 million to nearly $796 million. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Ascendis Pharma A/S maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A costs, increasing by about 4,100% from $6.3 million to $264 million over the same period.

While Alnylam's strategy may indicate a robust scaling approach, Ascendis's more measured increase suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into how biotech companies balance growth with operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025