Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000075043000
Friday, January 1, 2016973900000083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201710543000000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201810362000000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911848000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011693000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

AstraZeneca vs. Sarepta: A Tale of SG&A Optimization

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, AstraZeneca PLC and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. AstraZeneca, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022. This reflects their expansive global operations and extensive marketing efforts. In contrast, Sarepta, a smaller biotech firm, has kept its SG&A costs significantly lower, with a peak of around $482 million in 2023. This stark difference highlights AstraZeneca's broad market reach compared to Sarepta's focused niche strategy. Over the years, AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses have grown by about 35%, while Sarepta's have surged by nearly 900%, indicating rapid expansion. This data provides a fascinating insight into how two companies navigate the financial landscape of the pharmaceutical industry.

Short Description

"AstraZeneca vs. Sarepta: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled"

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025