Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

SG&A Cost Management: Sarepta vs. Taro

__timestampSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144931500091733000
Thursday, January 1, 20157504300087644000
Friday, January 1, 20168374900092365000
Sunday, January 1, 201712268200085656000
Monday, January 1, 201820776100088196000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928481200089971000
Wednesday, January 1, 202031787500093413000
Friday, January 1, 202128266000091355000
Saturday, January 1, 2022451421000113676000
Sunday, January 1, 2023481871000198366000
Monday, January 1, 2024218935000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by over 870%, peaking in 2023, while Taro's expenses grew by approximately 116% during the same period. This stark contrast highlights Sarepta's aggressive expansion strategy, reflected in its rising costs, compared to Taro's more conservative approach. Interestingly, Taro's expenses remained relatively stable until a notable increase in 2023, suggesting a strategic shift. As the industry evolves, these trends offer insights into how companies balance growth with cost management. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments, making it a pivotal year to watch.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025