Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Veracyte, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs. Veracyte: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCVeracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000040786000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000047876000
Friday, January 1, 2016973900000052035000
Sunday, January 1, 20171054300000055348000
Monday, January 1, 20181036200000065276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191184800000082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201169300000089118000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000181193000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000174078000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000184232000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AstraZeneca vs. Veracyte

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AstraZeneca PLC, a global pharmaceutical giant, and Veracyte, Inc., a rising biotech firm, present a fascinating case study in cost optimization from 2014 to 2023.

AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022, reflecting its expansive global operations. In contrast, Veracyte's expenses, though significantly lower, have grown by over 350% during the same period, indicating its rapid expansion and investment in growth.

While AstraZeneca's larger scale results in higher absolute costs, Veracyte's proportional increase highlights its aggressive market positioning. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by established and emerging companies in managing operational costs effectively.

Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into strategic financial management in the healthcare sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025