Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143021560008185000
Thursday, January 1, 20154022710008871000
Friday, January 1, 20164765930009645000
Sunday, January 1, 201755433600012387000
Monday, January 1, 201860435300014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 201968092400019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 202073766900017425000
Friday, January 1, 202175937500023040000
Saturday, January 1, 202285400900025116000
Sunday, January 1, 202393730000051953000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, BioMarin's SG&A expenses surged by over 200%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses increased by approximately 535%, albeit from a much smaller base, indicating a more aggressive scaling approach.

BioMarin's consistent increase in SG&A costs, peaking at nearly $937 million in 2023, suggests a robust investment in administrative capabilities and market expansion. Meanwhile, CymaBay's expenses, though significantly lower, reached $52 million in the same year, highlighting its strategic focus on lean operations. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in optimizing operational costs while pursuing growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025