Comparing SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: GSK's Stability vs. CymaBay's Growth

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201481850008246000000
Thursday, January 1, 201588710009232000000
Friday, January 1, 201696450009366000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017123870009672000000
Monday, January 1, 2018143810009915000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800011402000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500011456000000
Friday, January 1, 20212304000010975000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022251160008372000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023519530009385000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of GSK plc and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. over the past decade.

GSK plc: A Steady Giant

GSK plc, a global healthcare leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $9.8 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, GSK's expenses peaked in 2020, reflecting strategic investments in marketing and administration.

CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: A Rising Contender

In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc., a smaller biotech firm, has shown a remarkable growth trajectory. From 2014 to 2023, their SG&A expenses surged by over 500%, highlighting aggressive expansion and increased operational activities.

Insights and Implications

This comparison underscores the diverse financial strategies within the pharmaceutical sector, offering insights into how companies allocate resources to drive growth and innovation.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025