Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? CRISPR Therapeutics AG or Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Wednesday, January 1, 2014207170005114000
Thursday, January 1, 20154726900013403000
Friday, January 1, 20167115100031056000
Sunday, January 1, 20178867100035845000
Monday, January 1, 201812720000048294000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916986100063488000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015640700088208000
Friday, January 1, 2021192710000102802000
Saturday, January 1, 2022213041000102464000
Sunday, January 1, 202327527000076162000
Monday, January 1, 202472977000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Innovators

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Over the past decade, CRISPR Therapeutics AG and Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Amicus Therapeutics saw a staggering 1,230% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics managed a more modest 1,390% rise, indicating a more controlled approach to cost management.

While Amicus's expenses peaked at nearly 275 million in 2023, CRISPR's expenses remained below 103 million, showcasing a strategic focus on cost efficiency. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in balancing growth with financial prudence. As the industry evolves, these insights offer valuable lessons for emerging companies aiming to optimize their operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025