Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. or Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAgios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014191200008185000
Thursday, January 1, 2015359920008871000
Friday, January 1, 2016507140009645000
Sunday, January 1, 20177112400012387000
Monday, January 1, 201811414500014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 201913203400019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014907000017425000
Friday, January 1, 202112144500023040000
Saturday, January 1, 202212167300025116000
Sunday, January 1, 202311990300051953000
Monday, January 1, 2024156784000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Agios Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering 526% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics maintained a more conservative growth, with a 535% increase, but from a much lower base. By 2023, CymaBay's SG&A expenses were approximately 43% of Agios's, highlighting their more efficient cost management. This data underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in the biotech sector, where every dollar saved can be reinvested into groundbreaking research and development.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025