ImmunityBio, Inc. or Mesoblast Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: ImmunityBio vs. Mesoblast SG&A Strategies

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Mesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600054170000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600065378000
Friday, January 1, 20169439100052263000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100035072000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300027415000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600036983000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800050918000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600063586000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800057967000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000053107000
Monday, January 1, 202423626000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

ImmunityBio vs. Mesoblast: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ImmunityBio, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited have showcased contrasting strategies. ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2015 with a staggering 2,262% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Mesoblast maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses peaking in 2015 but only increasing by 21% from 2014. By 2023, ImmunityBio's expenses were approximately 2.4 times higher than Mesoblast's, highlighting a more aggressive spending approach. However, Mesoblast's consistent management might suggest a more sustainable model. The data reveals a missing entry for ImmunityBio in 2024, indicating potential reporting gaps. As these companies navigate the biotech sector's challenges, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025