Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eli Lilly and Company or Biogen Inc.

Eli Lilly vs. Biogen: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampBiogen Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201422323420006620800000
Thursday, January 1, 201521131000006533000000
Friday, January 1, 201619479000006452000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719355000006588100000
Monday, January 1, 201821063000005975100000
Tuesday, January 1, 201923747000006213800000
Wednesday, January 1, 202025045000006121200000
Friday, January 1, 202126743000006431600000
Saturday, January 1, 202224036000006440400000
Sunday, January 1, 202325497000006941200000
Monday, January 1, 202424037000008593800000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Biogen Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around 6.4 billion annually, compared to Biogen's 2.3 billion. However, Eli Lilly's expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking at 6.9 billion in 2023, a 5% rise from 2022. In contrast, Biogen's expenses have fluctuated, with a notable 38% increase from 2016 to 2023. This data suggests Eli Lilly's strategy might focus on expansive growth, while Biogen appears to be optimizing costs more aggressively. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial futures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025