Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eli Lilly and Company or BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

SG&A Cost Strategies: Eli Lilly vs. BioMarin

__timestampBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20143021560006620800000
Thursday, January 1, 20154022710006533000000
Friday, January 1, 20164765930006452000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175543360006588100000
Monday, January 1, 20186043530005975100000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196809240006213800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207376690006121200000
Friday, January 1, 20217593750006431600000
Saturday, January 1, 20228540090006440400000
Sunday, January 1, 20239373000006941200000
Monday, January 1, 202410090250008593800000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually. In contrast, BioMarin's expenses grew steadily, starting at approximately $302 million in 2014 and reaching $937 million by 2023, marking a significant increase of over 200%.

While Eli Lilly's expenses remained relatively stable, BioMarin's growth reflects its aggressive expansion strategy. This divergence highlights the different paths these companies have taken: Eli Lilly's focus on maintaining a steady cost structure versus BioMarin's investment in growth. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into how pharmaceutical companies navigate financial management in a dynamic industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025