Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Exelixis, Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Exelixis, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500050829000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100057305000
Friday, January 1, 20169645000116145000
Sunday, January 1, 201712387000159362000
Monday, January 1, 201814381000206366000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919238000228244000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000293355000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000401715000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000459856000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000542705000
Monday, January 1, 2024492128000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. This analysis compares Exelixis, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023. Exelixis, Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at $543 million in 2023, a tenfold increase from 2014. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses rising from $8 million in 2014 to $52 million in 2023, a sixfold increase.

Exelixis's aggressive spending strategy may reflect its growth ambitions, while CymaBay's restrained approach suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and financial management. As the biotech industry evolves, monitoring SG&A optimization will remain a key indicator of corporate strategy and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025