Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Genmab vs. Taro: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGenmab A/STaro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147952900091733000
Thursday, January 1, 20159122400087644000
Friday, January 1, 201610241300092365000
Sunday, January 1, 201714698700085656000
Monday, January 1, 201821369500088196000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934200000089971000
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000093413000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000091355000
Saturday, January 1, 20222676000000113676000
Sunday, January 1, 20233297000000198366000
Monday, January 1, 2024218935000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately 80 million to 3.3 billion, reflecting a growth of over 4000%. In contrast, Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses increasing by about 140% from 91 million to 219 million in the same period.

This data suggests that while Genmab A/S has aggressively expanded its operations, Taro has opted for a more conservative approach. The absence of data for Genmab A/S in 2024 highlights potential reporting gaps, emphasizing the need for consistent financial transparency. Understanding these trends is vital for investors and stakeholders aiming to gauge the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025