Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Genmab vs. Viking Therapeutics

__timestampGenmab A/SViking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014795290001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015912240005029636
Friday, January 1, 20161024130004846776
Sunday, January 1, 20171469870005329003
Monday, January 1, 20182136950007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193420000009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000010731000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000010701000
Saturday, January 1, 2022267600000016121000
Sunday, January 1, 2023329700000037021000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Genmab A/S: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 4,000%. This rise reflects the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. By 2023, their SG&A expenses reached a peak, indicating a robust growth strategy.

Viking Therapeutics, Inc.: A Conservative Approach

In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. has maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 2,900% over the same period. This strategy suggests a focus on lean operations, potentially allowing for more flexibility in resource allocation.

Both companies showcase distinct strategies in managing SG&A costs, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025