Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Alkermes plc

SG&A Cost Management: Gilead vs. Alkermes

__timestampAlkermes plcGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141999050002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153115580003426000000
Friday, January 1, 20163741300003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174215780003878000000
Monday, January 1, 20185264080004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195994490004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205388270005151000000
Friday, January 1, 20215609770005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226057470005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236897510006090000000
Monday, January 1, 20246452380006091000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Alkermes plc have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost optimization. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $6.1 billion in 2023. In contrast, Alkermes plc's SG&A expenses grew from around $200 million in 2014 to nearly $690 million in 2023, reflecting a more controlled growth trajectory.

Despite Gilead's larger scale, Alkermes has shown a remarkable ability to manage its SG&A costs, increasing by about 245% over the period compared to Gilead's 104% rise. This data highlights the strategic differences in cost management between the two companies, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025