Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Dynavax Technologies Corporation

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Gilead vs. Dynavax

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014177630002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015221800003426000000
Friday, January 1, 2016372570003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017273670003878000000
Monday, January 1, 2018647700004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019749860004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020792560005151000000
Friday, January 1, 20211001560005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221314080005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231529460006090000000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences has seen a consistent increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at $6.09 billion in 2023. This represents a 104% increase from 2014, reflecting their expansive growth and investment in administrative capabilities.

Dynavax Technologies Corporation: A Rapid Surge

Dynavax, on the other hand, has experienced a more dramatic rise, with SG&A expenses growing by 760% over the same period, reaching $152.9 million in 2023. This surge indicates aggressive scaling and strategic investments in their operational framework.

Both companies showcase unique strategies in managing SG&A costs, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025