Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc.

Gilead vs. Veracyte: A Decade of SG&A Growth

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Veracyte, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014298300000040786000
Thursday, January 1, 2015342600000047876000
Friday, January 1, 2016339800000052035000
Sunday, January 1, 2017387800000055348000
Monday, January 1, 2018405600000065276000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019438100000082720000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020515100000089118000
Friday, January 1, 20215246000000181193000
Saturday, January 1, 20225673000000174078000
Sunday, January 1, 20236090000000184232000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A: Gilead Sciences vs. Veracyte

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Gilead Sciences, a titan in the industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by over 100% from 2014 to 2023, peaking at approximately $6 billion. This reflects its expansive operations and strategic investments. In contrast, Veracyte, a burgeoning player, has experienced a more modest increase, with expenses rising from around $40 million to $184 million, marking a 350% growth. This surge underscores Veracyte's aggressive scaling and market penetration efforts. As we delve into these figures, it becomes evident that while Gilead's growth is steady, Veracyte's rapid expansion highlights its ambition to carve a niche in the competitive biotech arena.

Key Insights

  • Gilead's SG&A expenses doubled over the decade.
  • Veracyte's expenses grew by 350%, indicating rapid expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025