Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Incyte Corporation or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Incyte Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144326000165772000
Thursday, January 1, 2015226206000196614000
Friday, January 1, 201694391000303251000
Sunday, January 1, 201753821000366406000
Monday, January 1, 201835463000434407000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946456000468711000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000516922000
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000739560000
Saturday, January 1, 20221027080001002140000
Sunday, January 1, 20231296200001161300000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Incyte Corporation and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Incyte consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at $1.16 billion in 2023, a 600% increase from 2014. In contrast, ImmunityBio's expenses grew more modestly, with a 2900% increase, reaching $129 million in 2023. This disparity highlights Incyte's aggressive investment in administrative functions, possibly reflecting a strategy to support rapid growth. Meanwhile, ImmunityBio's more conservative approach may indicate a focus on lean operations. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in shaping their competitive edge in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025