Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142071700015746000
Thursday, January 1, 20154726900013392000
Friday, January 1, 2016711510009290000
Sunday, January 1, 2017886710007672000
Monday, January 1, 201812720000015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916986100022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015640700021864000
Friday, January 1, 202119271000037318000
Saturday, January 1, 202221304100048130000
Sunday, January 1, 2023275270000108146000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Amicus Therapeutics has seen a staggering 1,230% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at $275 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals has maintained a more conservative approach, with a 587% increase, reaching $108 million in the same year.

Strategic Implications

While Amicus's strategy suggests a focus on rapid growth, Madrigal's approach indicates a more measured expansion. Investors and stakeholders should consider these strategies when evaluating the long-term sustainability and profitability of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025