Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or MannKind Corporation

SG&A Cost Optimization: Madrigal vs. MannKind

__timestampMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.MannKind Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141574600079383000
Thursday, January 1, 201513392000108402000
Friday, January 1, 2016929000046928000
Sunday, January 1, 2017767200074959000
Monday, January 1, 20181529300079716000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192264800074669000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202186400059040000
Friday, January 1, 20213731800077417000
Saturday, January 1, 20224813000091473000
Sunday, January 1, 202310814600094314000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MannKind Corporation have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

From 2014 to 2023, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals has shown a remarkable ability to control SG&A expenses, with a steady increase from approximately $15 million in 2014 to over $108 million in 2023. This represents a growth of over 600%, reflecting strategic investments in administrative efficiency and sales operations.

MannKind Corporation

Conversely, MannKind Corporation's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking at around $108 million in 2015 and stabilizing at $94 million by 2023. Despite a 13% reduction from its peak, MannKind's expenses remain significantly higher than Madrigal's, indicating potential areas for cost optimization.

Both companies illustrate distinct strategies in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights into financial stewardship in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025