Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Madrigal vs. Supernus

__timestampMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141574600072471000
Thursday, January 1, 20151339200089204000
Friday, January 1, 20169290000106010000
Sunday, January 1, 20177672000137905000
Monday, January 1, 201815293000159888000
Tuesday, January 1, 201922648000158425000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021864000200677000
Friday, January 1, 202137318000304759000
Saturday, January 1, 202248130000377221000
Sunday, January 1, 2023108146000336361000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. Madrigal's SG&A expenses grew from approximately $15.7 million in 2014 to $108.1 million in 2023, marking a significant increase of nearly 588%. In contrast, Supernus started with $72.5 million in 2014 and reached $336.4 million by 2023, a 364% rise. While both companies have seen substantial growth in expenses, Supernus consistently spent more, peaking at $377.2 million in 2022. This data suggests that while Madrigal is catching up, Supernus has maintained a higher expenditure, possibly reflecting different strategic priorities or market conditions. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into each company's operational focus and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025