Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500015746000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100013392000
Friday, January 1, 201696450009290000
Sunday, January 1, 2017123870007672000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100015293000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800022648000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500021864000
Friday, January 1, 20212304000037318000
Saturday, January 1, 20222511600048130000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000108146000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Madrigal's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 587%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses increased by about 535% over the same period. Notably, Madrigal's expenses consistently outpaced CymaBay's, reflecting a more aggressive investment in administrative functions. However, both companies experienced significant jumps in 2023, with Madrigal's expenses reaching nearly double those of CymaBay. This trend highlights the dynamic nature of the biotech industry, where strategic financial management can be as critical as scientific innovation. As these companies continue to evolve, their ability to balance SG&A costs with growth ambitions will be pivotal.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025